|
Codifypedia |
| Twitter |
- 500 character Updates, larger than the 280 character limit on Twitter.
- Edit button which is lacking on Twitter.
- Twitter has no Clusters, which are based on a unique algorithm.
|
| LinkedIn |
- Tribes have more potential than LinkedIn groups which are known for spam, lack user involvement, and do not engage users.
- Codifypedia promotes user skills and user services on Expert Pages. These Expert Pages provide the foundation for the Skill Directory and Service Directory, which act as Yellow Pages, missing on LinkedIn.
- LinkedIn's engine is based on connections, whereas Codifypedia is based on followers, which is less restricting.
|
| Facebook |
- Facebook's engine is based on friend connections, whereas Codifypedia is based on followers, which is less restricting.
- Facebook groups do not depend on hash tags, and, therefore, are less effective than Tribes.
|
| YouTube |
- YouTube uses an algorithm to sort comments. In contrast, the Video pages on Codifypedia are based on chronology, which is more transparent.
- Codifypedia enables to discuss Channels, not just individual videos.
|